“Born to be Wild?”
Greg Martin
My friend Mike preached one of his first sermons built around Paul’s statement that we are “saints by calling,” and the question of whether we tend to think of ourselves primarily as sinners or saints. As I listened to his message, I kept thinking about something that I am fond of saying. I enjoy hunting as well as shooting sports such as trap, skeet, sporting clays, etc. and I am a member at a local gun club. I often make the connection between shooting and church by saying: "I go to the gun club for the same reason that I go to church. I go to the gun club, not because I am a good shot, but because I am a bad shot and I want to get better. Likewise I go to church, not because I am a saint, but because I am a sinner and I want to get better".
While this typically draws a smile from my listeners, Mike’s message that day made me think that perhaps I might just have it backwards. Perhaps my shooting would be improved if I were to think of myself as a good shot who occasionally misses rather than as a bad shot who occasionally hits the target. Likewise if I am called to be a saint, my walk of faith might just be improved if I were to think of myself as a saint who occasionally sins rather than as a sinner who occasionally walks according to the will of God.
Let me pause here to say that I am a sinner. I know that. Thanks to my wayward older brother Adam and my impetuous sister Eve I was born into a fallen world and I am a sinner only to be saved by grace. Got it.
When faced with a difficult topic I am fond of taunting my Sunday school class with the battle cry of the elementary schooler..."So what?...Who cares?". I think as Christians we have to pick up that battle cry sometimes and apply it to our walk of faith. As in, "So I am a sinner...So what? Who cares?" And, taken a step further..."What am I supposed to do about it?" I'd like to take a swing at answering that...to build on the concept of "saints by calling".
Just because I am a sinner doesn't mean that I am a victim forever destined to act in sinful ways. I am from south Louisiana and I am blessed to be of Acadian descent...a "Cajun" if you will. Cajuns are known to be lovers of spicy food, to enjoy poking fun at themselves, and more often than not, for enjoying the more-than-occasional adult beverage. I am guilty as charged. However, if I did not like spicy food I would still be a Cajun. See, I was born into the culture by virtue of my dad. My dad was fluent in both French and English, and my grandparents on my dad's side actually spoke more French than they did English. I cannot disclaim being a Cajun anymore than I can disclaim being a sinner. I was born into both.
I mentioned that Cajuns enjoy the more-than-the-occasional adult beverage. Which is a fancy way of saying they have a reputation as being hard drinkers; again, guilty as charged. I also happen to be the adult child of an alcoholic. My mom was an alcoholic for the majority of her life. She was drinking when she was pregnant with me (explains a lot, I know:-). Whether I drink or not will never change the fact that I was and am a child of an alcoholic. I was born into it.
And the battle cry is heard..."SO WHAT!? WHO CARES!?" And, taken a step further..."What am I supposed to do about it?"
The issue really comes down to will I react or respond to my life circumstance. (React being negative as in "the patient had a reaction to the medicine", vs. Respond being positive, as in "the patient is responding to the medicine".)
The philosophy applies to my life - all our lives - as sinners. We were all born into sin. So, "What are we supposed to do about it?" I think that that is what Paul was talking about when he says we are called to be saints. God blessed me with Free Will...with the ability to choose whether I react or respond to sin. The answer to the "Who Cares?" question is: God. God cares what you do about it. From Genesis to Revelation the bible documents our heavenly father's relentless pursuit of his wayward children. Because he cares he calls us to be saints - not just for him - but because he knows that when we act according to His will we will experience true joy.
If I think of myself as a saint first, then godly actions are expected and I become acutely aware of any action I take that is ungodly. If I think of myself as a sinner first, then ungodly actions are what are expected.
Let's take something that a lot of guys struggle with: pornography. Let's say I find myself alone in my home at my computer with time on my hands. If I consciously think of myself as a saint, it becomes really difficult to visit those sites. On the contrary, if I consciously think of myself as a sinner then my dalliances into the world of porn are not only accepted, but expected. "Of course I am spending time with my girls...I am a sinner, don't you know...didn't you hear the preacher call me a sinner on Sunday?"
Let's take another biggie for guys: anger. Let's say that my spouse/boss/child/ (you fill in the blank here) says or does something that has the potential to make me angry. If I consciously think of myself as a saint, I am more inclined to respond to the matter. If I think of myself as a sinner first, it is much easier to react in anger. In fact, if I consider myself a sinner I can typically find a way to justify my anger and be very self-righteous about it.
There's another aspect of this saint vs. sinner thing that is very insidious. If I consider myself a sinner rather than a saint by calling, I am much less inclined to hold a sinning brother or sister accountable. The logic goes like this: "I am a sinner because I did _____________ (again you fill in the blank). And, because I did _____________ ,who am I to tell someone else how to behave?" This is the great lie, of course, but many of us buy into it. I call this concept the Apathy of Hypocrisy…(kind of sounds like something Jesse Jackson might make up, doesn’t it?)
The concept of the “Apathy of Hypocrisy” will probably never be taught at the Candler School of Theology but (call it what you want) our understanding what it means is essential to our embracing the paradigm shift of thinking of ourselves as saints first rather than sinners. Since I made the concept up, I get to define it, right? So, the “Apathy of Hypocrisy” says that rather than appearing hypocritical for judging something in my present as compared to something in my past I will do nothing. It is very selfish, really.
The net effect of this concept could be stated as: “I care more about how I am perceived by others than I care about what is best for you.” It is the father who will not talk to his son about smoking pot because the father smoked pot as a teenager. It is the mother who won’t talk to her daughter about drinking and drugging because the mother struggled with the same issues in her past. It is the friend who lost his marriage because he was unfaithful failing to talk to his buddy when he knows his buddy is headed down a similar path.
One of the sales courses I took years ago taught the “feel, felt, found” approach to overcoming objections. Whatever objection a prospect gave could be handled with this simple technique: “I understand how you feel, I felt the same way, here’s what I have found….” I have found it to be a powerful sales tool and a powerful relationship tool. It helps you to find common ground and address concerns quickly. But, in the case of using it in relationship, it requires an aspect of transparency and that can be risky. To apply this technique in a relationship, I have to get over my fears of what you might think of me in order to help you.
The Apathy of Hypocrisy keeps us on the sidelines of life. It keeps us from fully engaging in the lives of those around us for fear of how it makes us appear. It is a selfish lie. The truth is: who better to remove a splinter from a brother’s eye than one who has removed a plank from his own eye? I understand how you feel. I have felt the same way. Here’s what I have found…
(Written 4/12/07 & 11/4/09)